Dreaming Toward America by James Dissette

0503-martin-luther-king-quotes_full_600
EmailShare

When I was a kid in Charleston, South Carolina, I saw a cross burning in a field one night as my father drove us to some place I can’t remember. I have no recollection of how I interpreted the meaning—that would come some years later—nor do I recall my parents’ explanation of why the night sky rippled with the flames of a burning crucifix.

I also could not understand why my caretaker, an immense, lovely black woman named Bess-Bess, would drink out of a separate water fountain when she took me for walks in the park. I surmised that she drank from an “adult” water fountain and that I had been relegated to the “children’s fountain.” Ironically, I felt left out—and  that some people were given separate rights, in this case age keeping me from tasting water better than mine.

Years later, two days out to sea on a Norwegian freighter hauling iron ore from Brazil to Baltimore, a stranger stepped out of the deck’s only forward structure, a hell-hole of an oven-hot paint shed. I say ‘stranger’ because after a few days at sea it’s a given that you could recognize the whole crew.

Lanky, wild-haired with electric green eyes, dark as an Amazon shadow and wearing the few tattered clothes he owned, Renee, a Brazilian stowaway, walked up to me with a smile as big as Christmas morning and asked, “America?” The rest was a torrent of Portugese, but the gist was that his dream was coming true and that he was finally headed to America. “Yes, America!,” I stuttered, only to realize that I was a mere deck boy, standing in blazing, sub-equatorial heat on the deck of ship in the middle of the ocean speaking in broken English to a Brazilian stowaway and knowing that his dream would lead to some kind of detainment and that his hopes would wither as he was pointed back to Brazil. This wasn’t going to turn out well.

But by the time the rest of the ship’s crew realized they had a stowaway, Renee had taken one of the chipping hammers and gone to work full-bore chipping away rust from everything in sight, an endless job on ships, and one I’d been all summer. He was so driven to prove himself he tried to work after dark.

The summer rolled on. The Captain allowed Renee to work with the deck boys and there was talk of some kind of official instatement. (Whether that would be under Norwegian maritime law or U.S. I never knew  and I often wondered if he ended up in Bergen rather than Baltimore.) Renee, along with the help of a Spaniard onboard, helped us decode Portuguese. Then one day Renee would not longer to speak to us. In fact, he shunned us. We were perplexed. Nothing untoward had taken place. My appeals to him were met with a wincing twist of his face conveying distrust, even disdain. Finally he took me to his cabin and showed me a magazine photograph—police attack dogs tearing into a black man, maybe in Birmingham, Alabama, maybe the Watts riots, it could have been anywhere, any city during the 60s. He looked at me as though I had betrayed him and said, “You do this in America.” It wasn’t even a question.

“Not all of us!,” was all I could summon, because at that moment something tore in me. America had been reflected back to me through another’s eyes and I could see the inherent and struggling beauty that is America, but I also could see its deep and divisive flaws.

These vignettes were my ‘cloud seeding’ before the rain of a little understanding. I had been slow on the uptake, insulated by geography and experience, and yes, being white and accepting the social paradigm unblinkingly. But the Civil Rights Movement, woven into the dark tangle of the 1960s—Viet Nam, assassinations, Kent State, the Chicago Democratic Convention—was embodied by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and it was his voice and call to peaceful but direct action that for many of us blew off the door of denial, our unwillingness to see, and inspired us to challenge the indignities of social injustice.

All of the complexities of the equality movement, handed down from early abolitionists like Sojourner Truth, Frederick Douglas and Harriet Tubman, found their way into the eloquence and courage of King’s mission to end racial segregation through non-violence, address poverty and end the war in Southeast Asia.

A burning cross in Charleston. A drink of water at a fountain. A  stowaway on a Norwegian freighter. We all have those moments, those intimate glimpses into the mirror to see ourselves and the country we continue to create. We either recognize them and are stung by the truth or the moment slips away to return again in some other manifestation. Revelation is spurred by conscience, sometimes to become choiceless action.

Acting on these self-evaluations was Dr. King’s great gift to us.

In a way, we are all heading to America, at least our understanding of it and how we want it to be. Like Renee, he have a certain image of it shaped by our hopes and fears. Like Martin Luther King’s Letter from Birmingham, written in the margins of a newspaper—the only paper he had in jail and smuggled out to his organization—America also is written piecemeal by all of us, a puzzle of notes to be decrypted, understood and announced.

“… I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states. I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial “outside agitator” idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds. (April 1963, from the Birmingham jail)
“An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself.” (ibid)

We have come a long way from the jails of Birmingham, but the journey continues as we address the systemic racial disparities throughout our society—prison incarceration (6 to 1), housing patterns, educational opportunities, to name a few.

Today is a good day to think upon these things and to remember the man who showed us that a dangerous march across a bridge in peaceful protest against injustice is never a bridge too far.

Congressman Harris’s Empty Chair

Screen Shot 2012-10-09 at 11.55.17 AM
EmailShare

The unexpected resignation of 1st District Democratic Candidate Wendy Rosen last month has had consequences well beyond the embarrassing allegation that Ms. Rosen might have committed voter fraud.

Coming just days after the state election ballot was printed, the Rosen withdrawal made it impossible for state Democrats to formally replace her name with that of Dr. John LaFerla, who lost to Ms. Rosen by only 57 votes in the April primary, and who was unanimously selected by state party leaders to fill Ms. Rosen’s slot.

Shortly after the Rosen resignation, Dr. Harris withdrew from previously scheduled debate forums in favor of holding local town meetings–under the rationale that it would be hard to accommodate a potentially large number of write-in candidates and still have a meaningful discussion of the issues.

Dr. Harris’ argument may have been persuasive for some at the time, but Dr. LaFerla’s ascendance as the choice of state Democrats, and the small field of write-in candidates, should give Congressman Harris pause to reconsider, and agree to participate in the candidate’s forum at Chesapeake College on October 21.

The political risks for Dr. Harris in joining the forum are remarkably small. The incumbent was already leading substantially in polls well before the Rosen withdrawal. The fact that she has been replaced with a write-in candidate makes it even more unlikely Dr. Harris will face an upset in November.

On the other hand, the extraordinary public value in the honest exchange of ideas, particularly in the area of social security and healthcare, between two well regarded physicians with different points of view, is significant, and should be played out for the benefit of voters.

With all of Dr. Harris’ political advantages of incumbency, financial backing, and an increasingly conservative 1st District, it will be hard for him to justify not taking his seat in Wye Mills later this month. It is the right thing to do for his constituents.

 

The Next Level

SureFire_MAG5-100_HCM_High_Capacity_Magazine_100-Shot_AR-15_M16_Box_Magazine_2
EmailShare

On Friday morning the NRA posted on their Twitter account (later redacted), “Good Morning, Shooters. Happy Friday. Any weekend plans?”

Mass murders are becoming America’s dark signature, a signature added to the greater narrative of gun violence in our country.

With untold millions of guns in the US, the 2004 end of the ban on assault weapons, the dangerously vague “Stand Your Ground” laws, unregulated Internet sales of ammunition, current NRA pushes to allow guns in businesses and restaurants that serve alcohol, and even colleges—the gun has become a predominant strand in the complex DNA of our society.

It’s a fait accompli. The laws are on the books. The Second Amendment has been protected and any arguments against its interpretation are moot.

“The quiet loner,” mentally ill or disturbingly vengeful, with an arsenal enough to kill and maim a roomful of theatergoers, a classroom of students, a subway of commuters, or random pedestrians in DC, finds his tools easily.

As the media descended on the town of Aurora, Colorado—a scene that is quickly becoming stock footage—I decided to look for a 90-round drum magazine for an AR-15—Assault Rifle-15— like the one used in Aurora, Colorado. In less than 10 seconds I found this:

“Take your shooting to the next level with this high capacity magazine.” $140, no problem. Maryland, to its credit bans the sale, transfer or receipt of any over-20-shot firearm magazines.

All the arguments for and against gun control become white noise muted by the echoes of 70 gunshots in a Colorado movie theater. And once again, like the brief outcry over the Virginia Tech slayings, little traction will be made in talking about making our world safer, election year or not.

FBI-NCIS background checks for gun ownership cites 130,000,000 applications for the years 1998-2011, a fraction of the picture if you include previously owned guns, loophole-legal gun show sales and flat out illegal transfers of guns impossible to estimate. The number of guns in the US today could range from 250 million to 400 million.

As WBEZ radio in Chicago recently reported, “while some 2,000 U.S. troops have been killed in Afghanistan since 2001, more than 5,000 people have been killed by gunfire in Chicago during that time, based on Department of Defense and FBI data.”

Few politicians dare to address the issue of guns and violence. Those that do are passively neutral or clash with contrarian defiance.

Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.), and ardent gun-control advocate, stated to ABC News that “now is a bad time to press the issue politically.”

Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) declared large magazines a Constitutional right. Banned during the Clinton administration, the ban on assault weapons and large ammunition clips expired in 2004.

Former Pennsylvania Governor, Ed Rendell, safely perched outside of electoral politics, said to ABC News, “We’re terrified of the NRA. We Democrats are as bad as the Republicans. Everyone is scared of the NRA,” Rendell said Friday on MSNBC. “There are some things worth losing for in politics, and to be able to prevent carnage like this is worth losing for.” At least he spoke up.

President Obama’s outline for steps to reinstitute the ban on assault weapons and large ammunition clips after the assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Gifford using high capacity (33-round) magazines for a Glock semi-auto handgun, faded into oblivion. Six were killed, a dozen wounded.

As Jen Psaki, Obama’s campaign spokeswoman, said on Air Force One responding to a question about an administration review of assault weapons and high capacity magazines in light of the Aurora, Colorado shootings, “we’re still learning what exactly happened here…so it’s too early to say how this will play.”

The learning curve must be steep. It’s been 45 years since the Texas Bell Tower Sniper killed 16 people, wounding 32.

Two days ago, NYC Mayor Bloomberg challenged both President Obama and Governor Romney with a national debate. Citing that Romney, in 2004 had already enacted a Massachusetts ban on assault weapons (specifically the AR-15), Bloomberg sees the Republican presidential candidate now as unsurprisingly mute on the subject and that Obama’s promise to renew the assault weapon ban simply faded away.

Currently there is no call to action.

A recent poll conducted through CNBC found that “43% of people felt that gun laws should be made stricter and a 55% majority believe that laws should stay the same or made more lenient.” Majority rules.

Like the acceptance of alcohol into the American culture—an estimated 70 alcohol related deaths per day in the U.S.— guns have been woven into the American psyche, its behavior and pathology. Federal and local gun laws have bolstered Second Amendment rights and while the majority of the population—hunters, gun enthusiasts ranging from collectors to target shooters—embrace legal and safe practices, we are still left with a statistic like this:

“Number of Murders by Firearms in the US during 2009: 9, 146.

Is there something to do or do we just mourn? What is the next level?

 

Dear Readers, July 13, 2012

EmailShare

Dear Readers:

It’s good to be back in Talbot County and thanks for the warm welcome. Even on a sweltering 4th of July week I was met with much enthusiasm and encouragement, and more importantly, made new friends who are helping me define my sense of the Easton community. Among those were Brenda Stango at Frugalicious, Keith Davidson and Mary at Trumpeter Swan Antiques,  Alexa Zullo at the Tidewater Inn, David Geller at We Cycle Ads, Kate Gallagher at Candle Light Cove and many more.

The Talbot Spy has a good foundation with lots of room to grow. Over the course of this next week I will be asking the fundamental question—what is our mission?

Most of all, I think, it is to amplify the already strong rapport we have with Talbot County. Comments made on our Facebook page and Spy site articles prove to me a thirst for communication whether it’s applause for the St. Michael’s Fresh Farm Market or criticism over recent county legislation.

The strength of an online presence lies not only in its editorial quality but also in its immediacy and it is this “real time” aspect we want to cultivate. The “kiosk” model—coming events, etc.— is the natural default state of online publications and that’s fine and I think the Talbot Spy does an amazing job at keeping up with it. But it happens not only because of our research and reporting but because you tip us off. It’s this currency with the readership that attracts me to the Spy. After all, its about community…and guess what? Writers walk among you! We’ll always encourage your ideas to make the Talbot Spy your daily portal to issues, events, hard news, the Arts, Business, Environment—the things on our minds, the aspects that make up a community’s diverse identity. So bring it on!

As national elections approach I will also state that I have no interest in promoting a political agenda by either screening my editorial choices or cherry-picking topics. As far as I’m concerned, if the topic has relevance to the health of Talbot County, the Eastern Shore proper or a shared relevance with the nation, political party affiliation becomes irrelevant. If I disagree with something, I will tell you why and be open-minded about your perspective. If I receive a letter citing statistics or without citations or sources I will check them myself—it’s my nature—otherwise we become little more than gossips. Strong, thoughtful opinion is always welcome, but prepare for footnotes.

Kathy Bosin, Dave Wheelan, Andy Goddard, Jean Sanders, Simon Kelly and Dan Menefee and previous editor Dick Cooper have all contributed to founding a strong presence for the Spy and have set a high standard for our editorial. I’m grateful for their vision.

Talbot County is an amazing place. Its strengths shine daily through the many issues confronting all of us individually and as a community. The Talbot Spy hopes to become an integral part of it and I look forward to meeting you all during the coming months. And, last but not least, let’s have fun!

Onward,

James Dissette

Editorial: The St. Michaels Town Commissioner Election

EmailShare

The Talbot Spy would be the first to acknowledge it is way too early in our short tenure to offer an opinion on the candidates now running for St. Michaels Town Commission. While we have been publishing the Spy in Talbot County for over a year now, we humbly remain a very new student in the ways of this remarkable little town.

One modest advantage that comes with newcomer status is an opportunity to observe. And since, as they say in the South, we have “no dog” in this particular  fight, it was interesting and reassuring to listen to all seven candidates at the election forum organized by the League of Women Voters last Wednesday night. While there were many differences in style and points of view, our lasting impression was that St. Michaels was lucky to have such a talented rooster of thoughtful, devoted citizens willing to serve the community.

As each candidate responded to questions from the moderator, there seemed to be a growing consensus that St. Michaels, blessed as it is with good citizens and balanced budgets, still faces some real financial challenges ahead. With limited resources, the town still is charged with providing an effective police force, find funds for tourism promotion, as well offer meaningful support to the retail sector as it recovers from the recession.  There seemed to be very little debate however that town government must lead in the years ahead.

It was a very positive sign that all seven candidates agreed to cooperate with new financial disclosure requirements recently mandated by the State of Maryland even though the town has made a formal request for a waiver. It was also encouraging to note that all seven candidates were eager to have more transparency and civility in how the town itself conducts its business.

Sadly, we also noticed during the election that the Miles Point controversy remains a sore wound  for some in the community. While we sense that many, if not most, have recovered and eager to “move on,” we note that others have a lingering mistrust of local government as a result of this decade long battle.

It may be of some relief to acknowledge that most towns experience their own version of a Miles Point controversy at some point in their history. How quickly those communities recover is a test of the overall health of the town and its citizens. With that in mind, we have little doubt St. Michaels will very soon enter a new phase of positive civic engagement, and demonstrate once again how special a town it is.

For the 1st District Democratic Nomination

EmailShare

Given the significant boost Representative Andy Harris received with the addition of mostly Republican communities into the newly expanded 1st Congressional district, it is a bit surprising that three Democratic candidates have come forward to challenge him in the November election.

The Spy has been closely following two of these candidates, Wendy Rosen from Cockeysville and John LaFerla of Chestertown, at party forums throughout the district. They also have contributed to our “Ask the Candidates” articles over the last few weeks with mostly thoughtful and serious responses, and we are grateful to both campaigns for doing so. Sadly, the third candidate, Kim Letke, did not respond to our requests to participate.

Not surprisingly, both Ms. Rosen and Dr. LaFerla are in agreement on most, if not all, policy issues. Both candidates emerge as generally moderate, showing strong support for the Obama Administration’s Affordable Health Care Act, deficit reduction plans, Iran and Afghanistan, while also firmly in line with Democratic party positions on reproductive rights and same sex marriages. Whatever differences exist, they are not significant enough to highlight here.

They also share the fact that they are both political novices. While it is honorable and inspiring that Ms. Rosen and Dr. LaFerla have entered this race, despite limited resources or battle tested campaign organizations, they both face a steep, and at times painful, learning curve that inevitably handicaps both campaigns as they look to a fall election against Dr. Harris.

The only significant difference seems to rest on style. Dr. LaFerla, perhaps showing his years of consulting with patients, seems mild-mannered in tone, while Ms. Rosen displays a feistiness and passion that has served her well in the world of business. Both styles have positives and negatives in light of Dr. Harris’ own political weaknesses and strengths.

Where we believe Dr. LaFerla may have an advantage is with his experience related to national health care. As the oral arguments made this week at the Supreme Court on “Obamacare” made clear, there remains profound differences in this country on the methods and legal strategies needed to manage health care costs. A candidate that matches, or even exceeds, Dr. Harris’ own experience in the health field is a compelling reason to support Dr. LaFerla next Tuesday.

Regardless who wins the Democratic nomination, the road remains an uphill one for the victor of Tuesday’s election. Dr. Harris, no matter how misguided and extreme his political agenda might seem, remains a well-financed incumbent capable of an aggressive and well-executed campaign. We hope the successful candidate will continue to rapidly assimilate to the world of politics so that the fall election is a competitive one.

Editorial: Our Queer Winter

EmailShare

To the great relief of many, the only significant controversy circling around town in these slow days of January and February is the ongoing debate on why we are experiencing April in winter this year. As the Eastern Shore continues to have record high temperatures with clear blue skies day after day, the natives have been pondering what this all means.

We’ve noticed several camps of thought. The first being described as the pollyannists. They argue that the current phenomenon is just payback for the brutal winters we had in 2009 and 2010. It is their position that a caring and loving god will make up for past seasons of unpleasantness.

The second camp are the consequentialists. As a result of these warm weeks of winter, the gods will torture us with a summer of endless 100 degree days as punishment for this taste of spring.

And then, there are the global warming folks. With their sobering data of weather patterns and hurricane frequency charts, they paint a picture of the Shore becoming the new Florida as the Sunshine state begins its decent into the Atlantic Ocean. They warn this is just the beginning of some really serious weather wackiness.

Finally, there are the existentialists, those that don’t ponder cause and effect but rather seize the day. While a relatively large percentage of this group seem to be canines, those with two legs can be found taking bike rides, clean up gardens, playing tennis, and anticipating the lower heating bills.

We tend to side with the existentialists. While mindful of the possible repercussions for this most queer of winters, living in the moment seems to be the best response of all.

Editorial: Session 2012 and Medical Marijuana

EmailShare

It is hard to believe that anyone who has seen a loved one suffer through the last phases of a terminal illness could possibly advocate for the continued ban of medical marijuana in Maryland. Those gut-wrenching moments experienced by families, be they social conservatives or liberals, convince most that pain management for the dying must be the primary goal in delivering final care for the patient. And that includes the use of cannabis.

To have access to the widest range of tools for pain is critical for caregivers and their patients. Every day without suffering allows the dying the time needed to find peace with spouses, children, relatives and their own life experience. It seems inconceivable that a organic substance as relatively benign and  effective in treatment as THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) found in marijuana would not be legally available to help those who suffer, and yet in the State of Maryland this is still the case.

Beyond the inconvenience and the legal risks caregivers must take to find medical marijuana, someone in possession of cannabis is still subject to humiliating arrest and fines in this state. Last year, the Governor signed into a law a Senate bill that attempted to mitigate this to some degree by allowing defendants suffering from “a debilitating condition” to use their medical status as a ‘affirmative defense’ to eliminate criminal penalties. And yet this defense cannot be used in their defense if they face charges of growing the same marijuana in their backyard. It is a poorly written and vague part of state law that must be corrected.

It’s now time for the General Assembly to finish the job and provide a pathway for the legal, safe, and accessible use of medical marijuana with the passage of the Maryland Medical Marijuana Act (HB 15) proposed by Delegate Cheryl Glenn of Baltimore. Modeled after successful programs in the other sixteen states that allow medical marijuana, Del. Glenn’s bill deserves the support of those committed to humane patient care in our state.

 

Editorial: Real Raven Fans Need Respect on Sunday

EmailShare

While the Raven victory over Houston last Sunday was not perhaps the team’s best game, it was still unbearably dramatic in the last quarter as Baltimore held on to their skimpy lead. For real Ravens fans, it seemed like a lifetime, as they watched the Texans complete pass after pass while Flacco continued to be humiliatingly sacked.

But perhaps the greatest disappointment felt by Baltimore’s true blue was having to attend one of the thousands of game parties throughout Maryland last weekend, since there was a good chance they didn’t actually see the game by doing so.

Playoff parties are in many ways the greatest dilemma for real fans. On the face of it, these gatherings are innocent looking enough affairs. What’s wrong with friends gathering to cheer the home team on? With good beer and a table of top shelf goodies, the idea of settling down to watch your neighbor’s “state of the art” flat-screen TV sounds pretty darn good to the dedicated.

And yet serious danger lurks at these events. Sometime soon after the first kick off, game parties become real parties. Spouses and half-hearted fans start chatting with only token eye contact with the sports broadcast. By halftime, real conversations begin. And by the third quarter, the die-hard realizes that most of the people in the room don’t realize there is a football game going on at all, let alone one about a divisional championship. It can be maddening for the devoted.

Even more perilous for the real fan is to be held hostage in one of those deadly conversations with one of the indifferent. What was once a simple task of grabbing another beer and some chips during the commercial break becomes a gauntlet of hazardous social sand traps, complete with iPhone slide shows of renovation projects gone wrong.

As the devoted few creep back to their seats, they look back at their “friends” and remember the words of Eddie in the movie “Diner” after his fiance had flunked his Baltimore Colts quiz, “You… You…You make me sick.”

Next Sunday will prove to be another challenging moment for the Ravens fan. New England will not be a walk in the park. Baltimore will need the complete focus of the players, the coaches, and their fans to find victory. So at the new game party this Sunday, when one sees the fanatics sitting by themselves, show respect for the Ravens fan, like any other professional, for doing their job.

Editorial: Congressman Harris’ First Year in Office

EmailShare

Prior to Andy Harris’ election in 2010, the Spy endorsed his opponent Frank Kratovil, but we did so with far less enthusiasm than we had expected as a result of his vote against the Obama health care reform act. While there was a good bit to admire about Mr. Kratovil (and still is), many moderates and progressives felt he had betrayed his principles by voting against better health care protection for his constituents. The Spy shared that point of view.

Sticking to one’s principles is an important thing to respect in a politician, and this is particularly true on the Eastern Shore. The region’s admiration for Wayne Gilchrest and Harry Hughes are just two significant examples of the high regard our region has for those who stand tall against the status quo.

And in some ways, Dr. Harris’ first year in Congress has shown the type of tenacity which compares well with other independent Maryland leaders we admire and respect. Congressman Harris has remained rock firm, sometimes against enormous political pressure, in not compromising on matters involving the national debt limit and budget reductions for entitlement programs.

So it is difficult to find fault with this kind of political courage. And yet, sadly, we do.

Dr. Harris, while he has indeed stuck to his convictions, has also repeatedly used, or been party to, political strategies that have demeaned our system of government and threatened the good faith and credit of our country. The consequences of which have been extremely disruptive for our economy and in building the financial confidence of our people.

Since the beginning of of 2011, Dr. Harris has joined a special minority of Congress that believes that blowing things up is the only way to create change in Washington. By throwing legislative fire bombs and ultimatums, there is a belief that this form of self-destructiveness can somehow accomplish what hard bipartisan work can not. These strategies are used in revolutions not in mature democracies.

It would be disingenuous to suggest the congressman is lacking in intelligence in this regard. As his recent endorsement of Newt Gingrich for president suggests, he comes from a school of political thought that is expansive with ideas and economic theory. Anyone hearing Dr. Harris’ presentation on national debt, or the role of government, should acknowledge his intellectual conviction in this new paradigm for America.

Nonetheless, at the core, the Harris prescription to quickly and dramatically dismantle the power and role of the federal government is dangerous to our country, nor does it reflect the 1st District’s best interests.

Much can happen in a year. After Representative Kratovil’s first twelve months, the congressman appeared to be in step with his convictions and his voting record. It is hypothetically possible that in 2012, Dr. Harris might use his capacity for critical thinking and return to the world of ideological common sense.

In the meantime, we hope that Dr. Harris will come to understand that the Hippocratic Oath’s great precept “do no harm” holds true for governance as is does for medicine.